In Outlook 2007, a user is allowed to have total 50,000 items in each folder and 500 folders.If the folder exceeds the number of items per folder limit or mailbox contains a large number of emails, then also it starts creating issues.In Outlook 2003 it starts degrading after 4 GB of usage.If a user is using Outlook 2007 or above versions, then the performance issues will starts after 12 GB of usage.In Outlook 2002 and below versions, account starts degrading after 2 GB usage of PST data files.Yes, it is true that Outlook data files and mailbox folders have some predefined size limit. Reasons: Outlook Performance Issues With Large Mailboxes Therefore, to avoid all such issues and to improve Outlook 2019, 016, 2013, 2010 performance and efficiency, there are some tricks available, that anyone can follow easily. This will lead to starting creating issues like performance problems, efficiency problems in the Outlook account. So, if the Outlook mailbox contains a large number of items in its mailbox, then the size of Outlook mailbox will increase unnecessarily large. When a user tries to perform some particular action using Outlook data file (PST) or Cached Exchange Mode.If all default folders like Inbox, Sent Items, Calendars, Tasks, and Deleted Items folder of Outlook contains a large number of items.
The most common problems that cause Outlook performance issues with large mailboxes are: But the problem starts arising when there is a large number of items in a single folder. As it is so much in use among the users so it contains lots of important data. It is one of the oldest email clients with lots of versions like: Outlook 2000, 2002, 2003, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019 and many other previous editions. Microsoft Outlook is the most popular email client used by the business as well as personal users. I don't know if this problem only occurs with Gmail accounts, but it is a significant limitation to the method, and I would suggest that a note be added to the description advising users of this potential limitation.Ashwani Tiwari ~ Modified: T12:01:02+00:00 ~ Outlook, Tips ~ So, this limitation had a great impact on me, and perhaps other users as well.Įvery time I perform a Send/Receive operation, these folders are synchronized, greatly extending the time it takes for a Send/Receive to complete. Synchronization with the Gmail server deleted all messages not found on the Gmail server, which included all of my email history from previous email accounts. When I attempted to unsubscribe from these folders, in each case I got a message stating that I could not unsubscribe from that folder, that it was a special folder and could not be unsubscribed from in Outlook.įor several years, I have used my Outlook Inbox and Sent Mail as email message repositories, saving emails from different mail servers. I was able to disable subscribing for some folders, but there is a group of folders for which unsubscribing is disallowed: I am using an Outlook 2016 email client that has an IMAP connection to a Gmail server, and did not find this method to be completely effective. Note: If you want to subscribe to a specified IMAP folder which you have disabled subscribing before, please get into the IMAP Folders dialog box firstly, secondly click the Query button, next click to highlight the IMAP folder on the All tab, then click the Subscribe button.
Then you will notice although the specified IMAP folder remains on the Navigation Pane, it has stopped subscribing in your Microsoft Outlook. Step 4: Click to highlight the IMAP folder you will disable subscribing on the Subscribed tab, click the Unsubscribe button, and then click the OK button to exit this dialog box. Step 3: In the popping up IMAP folders dialog box, click the Query button. Note: If you are using Outlook 2007, please click the Tools > IMAP Folders. Step 2: Click the IMAP folders button on the Folder tab. Step 1: Shift to the Mail view, and click one IMAP folder you will disable subscribing to in the Navigation Pane. To disable subscribing to IMAP folders in Microsoft Outlook, please do as following:
0 kommentar(er)
